|
About this illegal imprisonment |
||
CLICK PICTURE
|
|
MARIJUANA ADVOCATE JAILED FOR ESPOUSING LEGALIZATION Marijuana legalization advocate Ed "njweedman" Forchion is in trouble with the law again. Forchion was jailed Monday night after he "alledgedly" violated the terms of the supervisory program in which he is enrolled, officials said yesterday. As a result, the Tom Bartlett, regional director for the Intensive Supervision Program, said Forchion violated provisions of the program by advocating marijuana use. Participants in the Intensive Supervision Program are released early from prison but must remain drug-free and abide by other regulations. "He agreed he was not going to
promote marijuana use," In a telephone interview from the
Burlington County Jail in Forchion said he simply expressed his opinions on free speech and the nation's war on drugs in the commercials. "This is Forchion has long maintained that his First Amendment rights are being violated because he cannot freely practice his faith as a Rastafarian or state his beliefs. Forchion was charged with
helping his brother and another man pick up a shipment of 40 pounds of
marijuana at Forchion was tried on charges of distributing marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in October 2000 but pleaded guilty to those charges and two unrelated charges during his trial. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison in December 2000 and served 16 months in prison before he was admitted into the Intensive Supervision Program. Under the terms of the program, Forchion must refrain from smoking marijuana and must obtain a job. He also must provide regular urine samples to demonstrate that he is staying clean. Forchion also cannot advocate the legalization of marijuana. In each of the three, 30-second commercials that he taped, Forchion wears a shirt bearing a marijuana leaf and stands in front of an American flag. In one of the commercials, he advocates free speech. In another, he says that marijuana has medicinal benefits. In the third, he criticizes the government's war on drugs. Forchion tried to buy time from Comcast to televise the commercials, but the cable company declined to air them. Comcast spokeswoman Nissa O'Mara said
the commercials violated the company's advertising policy against
promoting drug use. |
![]() COMMERCIAL 1 |
![]() COMMERCIAL 2 |
![]() COMMERCIAL 3 |
FOR
MAKING THESE "POLITICAL AD'S" THE STATE OF NEW
|
After
seeing the 8/15 and 8/17
TRENTONIAN stories (below) State ISP official Thomas Bartlett and ISP
Officer Mike Ramirez presented an Arrest Petition and WARRANT before
OCEAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE GIOVINE and despite the obvious
violation of a citizens right to “FREE SPEECH” he signed it. ( SEE
WARRANT) – Also
read the correspondence between Judge “JACK-ASS”
GIOVINE and the WEEDMAN”! (GIOVINE LETTERS) -- This
was a crime! They conspired to have me imprisoned to silence me,
because they didn't like what I talked about!!! I was being legally SCREWED! |
FORCHION
Vs STATE OF NEW JERSEY (02-cv-4942) ( SEE FEDERAL RULING - "RELEASING NJWEEDMAN" ) In this case
Federal Judge Irenas eventually ruled that I had
the RIGHT to exercise free speech and the State of New Jersey had
attempted to
violated that RIGHT with my "imprisonment to silence
me" and he ordered
me released. My question to every lawyer, Politican, law enforcement
Officer, Reporter and Editorial Board is why hasn't the New Jersey
Attorney General or the U.S. Attorney charged these state officials
with criminal deprivation of my "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS". -- (SEE-HYPOCRITES) -
THIS WAS A CRIME AND HERE IS THE LAW
VIOLATED
s 37, 18 U.S.C.A. Statute 88 s 19 18
U.S.C.A. section 51- "If two or more persons conspire to
injure, oppress, threaten or intimidate any citizen in the free
exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the
U.S. Constitution or laws of the UNITED STATES, or because of his
having so exercised the same, or if two or more persons go in disguise
on the highway or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or
hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any a RIGHT or privilege so
secured they shall be fined not more than $5000 and imprisoned not more
than ten years, and shall, moreover, be thereafter ineligible to any
office, or place of honor, profit, or trust created by the U.S.
Constitution or laws of the UNITED STATES".
|
|
|
|
||||
THE TRENTONIAN( 'Weedman' TV Ad Yanked by Comcast
|
|
|
|
|
IS THIS
STILL
IT'S
NOT GOOD ENOUGH TO SAY YOUR JUST DOING YOUR
JOB OR FOLLOWING ORDERS! THAT'S WHAT THE NAZI'S CLAIMED, THAT'S WHAT
COMMUNIST SOLDIERS CLAIM. BUT IN
HELP OUT THE
"NJWEEDMAN"
Write or Call these local NJ state officals!
Be sure your mail indicates clearly to these authorities that "WE THE PEOPLE" ARE AWARE of Ed Forchions' plight and that WE CARE! Be sure to indicate that Americans still believe in the "BILL of RIGHTS" and the "War on some Drugs" is unjust and wrong and that we will not be puppets for the homeland. Everyone has the right to speak! WE as the beneficiaries of God's most favoured herb have a voice and unused, there is silence...The Constitution gives "we american's" the right to voice our dissent that's WEEDMAN was doing!
|
|
|
|
HARVEY
GOLDSTEIN |
|
|
Assistant
Attorney General |
Assistant
Attorney General |
![]()
Lend Ed a hand by Writing
these Politicians and asking them what
happened to
Freedom of
Speech in
"Freedom
of Speech"!
Ed Forchion was
locked away
for "supposedly" for violating the terms of (ISP) Intensive Supervised
Program, the crime: of produceing 3
anti-drug war
Television commercials,
THAT
WERE
NEVER AIRED;
ALL ED
FORCHION DID WAS speak the TRUTH about
the war on SOME
drugs.
SO WHO
WAS
HARMED BY THESE EVIL TV SPOTS?
IF A TREE FALLS IN
THE
Is
it because as a BLACK-MAN he would have
great access and credibility before AFRICAN-AMERICANS; who are by a
large the
greatest victims of this so-called war on drugs.
Was this a
attempt to silence a future "POLITICAL FORCE"? THE TRUTH is everyone
including ‘convicted persons’ have the right of “FREE SPEECH”.
The
![]()
ISP Manager
(Harvey Goldstein) is stating that Ed violated the terms of his
release however
Ed Forchion DID NOT advocate
the use
of marijuana or any other illegal substance! He only
advocates
the changing of the current Marijuana laws. How could that be illegal,
isn’t
that how laws are changed in
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY AND THE STATE JUDGE(s) IN ED'S CASE, ARE ALSO VIOLATING THE RIGHT TO A ‘SPEEDY TRIAL’ BY FILIBUSTERING THE AFTERNOON AWAY, SO ED COULD NOT PRESENT HIS DEFENSE THUS LEAVING HIM IN JAIL FOR LONGER!
In
|
COMCAST SAY'S NO TO: NJWEEDMAN ANTI-DRUG WAR ADVERTISEMENTS |
COMCAST CENSORSHIP
|
PRO-DRUG WAR ADVERTISEMENTS |
The violation is against Ed
Forchion's family
and his 1st Amendment right to FREE
SPEECH!
|
"THE-NJWEEDMAN" ARRESTED FOR DARING TO ATTEMPT TO AIR ANTI-DRUG WAR COMMERCIALS |
|||
|
DRUGWAR.COM No Freedom of Speech for Ed "NJWeedman" Forchion by Political
candidate and outspoken marijuana legalization proponent Ed “NJWeedman” Forchion
is under arrest again in At this time details about his charges are still a bit sketchy, as the Burlington County jail refuses to divulge any information about the case other than that he is in the jail, alleging that they are not allowed to "release any information to civilians.” (The Burlington Co. jail later amended this statement, telling Drugwar.com that we were entitled to have this information, but only from the warden, who has not returned repeated calls.) Forchion has a long history of fighting for the right to use marijuana, and of paying the consequences for battling prohibition. He’d had a couple of minor brushes with the law over petty offenses in his early years (but compared to many of the corporate crooks still sitting pretty without seeing the inside of a jail cell, he’s an angel of propriety). In November of 1997, having built up a thriving marijuana smuggling business while working as a truck driver driving his own rig, he was arrested in a sting operation as he and his brother were trying to pick up a FedEx package containing 40 pounds of marijuana. This lead to both brothers, along with a third friend, being the first people tried in New Jersey under the then-new Omnibus Crime Act, which allows for anyone convicted of trafficking over 20 pounds of pot, even their first offence, to do 20 years in prison. While
awaiting trial, Forchion undertook a campaign to bring marijuana reform
into the public consciousness, as well as the right to Jury Nullification (which is illegal in New Jersey)
running unsuccessfully for office in the US congress and for the office
of Burlington County Freeholder, as the sole member of the Legalize
Marijuana Party. Forchion also undertook civil disobedience, lighting
up joints in the New Jersey State Assembly and at the Liberty Bell,
among a dozen or so very public places. Two years, 15 hearings, and
three judges later, Forchion accepted a plea bargain of 6 months in
jail and 27 months in New Jersey’s Intensive Supervised Parole program, after refusing to
rat out his marijuana connections. Reporting to the Riverfront Prison
in Camden, NJ, on Jan. 12, 2001, (where prison guards immediately found
10 joints secreted within the sole of his sneaker), Forchion was
informed he was not yet eligible for ISP, due to his “extensive”
criminal history. He did 15 months inside before finally getting
released on “I'm still fighting this conviction,” Forchion wrote Drugwar.com in an email a few hours before his arrest Monday. “My parole officer (Tom Bartlett) also ordered me not to talk to the press. Which I regarded as a illegal order. Because I knew such a order not to talk to the press was illegal I gave a few interviews anyway. On May 27th, I stood outside the Burlington County Courthouse and protested my not being able to see my daughter because of the Religion [Rastafari] I have chosen. I passed out fliers and was interviewed by the Burlington County Times and the Trentonian.” On the following day he was placed under house arrest, then was arrested on June 6 and sat in jail for four days for speaking to the newspapers. “I was
livid,” writes Forchion, “this was totally un-American. So I contacted
Peter Christopher of http://www.nextplayvideo.com/
(Activist video) and asked him if he could help me by making a couple
of First Amendment commercials for me. He did, we made three. I went to
Comcast here in Mt Laurel, NJ, and presented them. They ( “In our standard advertising contract, there is a paragraph that prohibits habit forming drugs and illegal products from appearing in advertising spots. so it is a cut and dried situation for the company,” said David Shane, Comcast's vice-president of corporate communications. “The spots clearly violate the agreement that he signed, so as a result we returned his $100 deposit, and the company is not running the spots.” When it was noted that Comcast takes money from, and airs commercials by both the Office of National Drug Control Policy’s National Anti-Drug Media Campaign, and the Partnership for a Drug-Free America, Shane said, “They don’t promote the use of habit forming drugs or drug paraphernalia. Let me read you the contract, the clause in the contract. ‘The following material is explicitly prohibited. Drugs/illegal products, including habit forming drugs, drug paraphernalia, or establishments that promote these products. Also included is advertising for a product of service which is illegal or has no legitimate use in the country, state, or municipality where systems franchise area [sic] are located.' So it’s pretty clear these spots violate that portion of the contract.” Although it is clear that marijuana has many different legitimate uses despite the US prohibitionist rhetoric and laws to the contrary, and may or may not be habit forming for some people, Shane stuck to his guns, but did not mention whether or not pharmaceutical companies which market habit forming drugs on Comcast have to abide by this same agreement. He did note that “Anybody who advertises on Comcast signs this standard advertising contract. Again, anything promoting the use of habit forming drugs or drug paraphernalia are prohibited on Comcast.” “I’m so fucking mad I could spit,” Peter Christopher told Drugwar.com when contacted about Comcast‘s decision and Forchion’s subsequent arrest. “We’re trying to get activists to do stuff like this. Sponsor some public access, shoot their own video. It took about 4 hours one afternoon at Ed’s house. I’m almost embarrassed to tell you how quickly I edited them. We wrote them for 30 seconds slots, timed them, and tried them. Actually the commercials were written and edited by a friend of mine. We’re trying to influence people to come out and work with us. I think they will.” Christopher points out how the system has really gone after Forchion, because he represents the counter-culture, he is very loud about his beliefs, and is not afraid of the repercussions that have resulted for standing up for what he believes is right. “These things go unchallenged every day,” says Christopher. “Guys get tossed around, nobody does anything about it. Why? I think a lot of it is fear. I’m going to tell you this, and you think about it. It may have never occurred to you. The problem is the system has turned too many people. Four out of five people tell them everything they want to know. How can you go from that situation to being an activist? How can you look other people in the face and help them change the laws when you’ve told on them? Eighty percent of the people arrested tell all. Those are the statistics, they don’t lie.” But Forchion himself refused to roll over and tell all. On Monday
night, Forchion reported for his weekly parole meeting. At the end,
everyone was told they could go except Forchion, according to
Christopher, who spoke at length with Forchion later that night.
Forchion was taken into custody, during which his new commercials were
mentioned as the reason his parole was being violated, then taken to the Forchion does not yet have a lawyer assisting him. He is also seeking help in obtaining enough money to run the commercials in any venue he can get them on. “The War on Drugs is being fought by two sides, the Government side and the winning side,” Forchion points out. “Apparently Comcast only wants the government side’s opinions expressed. This is absolute censorship. Yes, I had a shirt on with a "weed-leaf". Comcast airs far worst! They aired my campaign commercials three years ago and in those I had a bong and a fake weed leaves hanging out my suit jacket pocket. It wasn't the shirt, it was the words they didn't like. I was questioning the War on Drugs and what it is doing to the principals of freedom this country was founded on. This is an example." |
|||
MARIJUANA ADVOCATE JAILED FOR ESPOUSING LEGALIZATION OF DRUG Marijuana legalization advocate Ed "njweedman" Forchion is in trouble with the law again. Forchion was jailed Monday night after he violated the terms of the supervisory program in which he is enrolled, officials said yesterday. As a result, the Tom Bartlett, regional director for the Intensive Supervision Program, said Forchion violated provisions of the program by advocating marijuana use. Participants in the Intensive Supervision Program are released early from prison but must remain drug-free and abide by other regulations. "He agreed he was not going to
promote marijuana use," In a telephone interview from the
Burlington County Jail in Forchion said he simply expressed his opinions on free speech and the nation's war on drugs in the commercials. "This is Forchion has long maintained that his First Amendment rights are being violated because he cannot freely practice his faith as a Rastafarian or state his beliefs. Forchion was charged with
helping his brother and another man pick up a shipment of 40 pounds of
marijuana at Forchion was tried on charges of distributing marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute in October 2000 but pleaded guilty to those charges and two unrelated charges during his trial. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison in December 2000 and served 16 months in prison before he was admitted into the Intensive Supervision Program. Under the terms of the program, Forchion must refrain from smoking marijuana and must obtain a job. He also must provide regular urine samples to demonstrate that he is staying clean. Forchion also cannot advocate the legalization of marijuana. In each of the three, 30-second commercials that he taped, Forchion wears a shirt bearing a marijuana leaf and stands in front of an American flag. In one of the commercials, he advocates free speech. In another, he says that marijuana has medicinal benefits. In the third, he criticizes the government's war on drugs. Forchion tried to buy time from Comcast to televise the commercials, but the cable company declined to air them. Comcast spokeswoman Nissa O'Mara said the commercials violated the company's advertising policy against promoting drug use. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
TRENTONIAN Day 5 of WEEDMAN hunger strike! Ed "NJWEEDMAN" Forchion,
sitting in
|
|||
|
THE The Weedman lands back in the pokey for questioning pot laws. JONATHAN VALANIA (jvalania@philadelphiaweekly.com) Ed Forchion, aka the New Jersey Weedman, is back behind bars for allegedly violating the terms of his parole by trying to get a series of anti-drug-war commercials aired on CNN. As per the terms of his parole--a sort of double secret probation called Intensive Supervised Parole (ISP)--Forchion is prohibited from publicly advocating the use or marijuana. Last April Forchion was released from prison, where he was serving a 10-year sentence on marijuana distribution and possession charges, and placed on ISP. Forchion's latest incarceration--the second time this summer he's been put behind bars for speaking to the media or airing his views on drug laws--stems from his attempt in early August to book airtime with Comcast Cable for a series of commercial spots that question the constitutionality and scientific validity of the criminalization of marijuana. Forchion was hoping to
run the ads locally during CNN's In the spots, Forchion never encourages or advocates the recreational use of marijuana. Instead, he argues that the war on drugs is unconstitutional. In all three spots, Forchion stands before an American flag, goateed and dreadlocked, wearing a T-shirt emblazoned with marijuana leaves. Prior to Comcast's
refusal to air the spots, Forchion, who has been effective in advancing
his opinions through the media, told both the Trentonian and
the Burlington County Times that the ads were set to run. It
was through these newspaper stories that Tom Bartlett, regional
director of the ISP program, learned about the commercials and promptly
had Forchion arrested on Aug. 19 and sent to "He agreed that he would
not promote marijuana use," An ISP parole hearing is scheduled for Sept. 17. "This is like Alice in Wonderland: sentence first, ISP hearing later," says Forchion's attorney, John Vincent Saykanic, who has filed a motion for bail. Forchion began a hunger strike on Aug. 26 and vows to continue it till his release. He told PW through an intermediary that he's concerned that prison officials will start force-feeding him.
|
|||
|
TRENTONIAN A FEDERAL CASE: "WEEDMAN" seeks releif from higher court The case of Ed "NJWEEDMAN" Forchion is headed to federal court. Believing
that he is being held in jail unconstitutionally, Forchion petitioned
the federal district court in Judge Joseph Irenas accepted Forchion's petition, and now the state has until Oct. 28 to explain to the judge why Forchion is sitting in the clink "The judge clearly saw something legitimate," said John Furlong, a local lawyer and expert in these matters. "He [Forchion] made it through the door, which puts him head and shoulders above everyone else." Furlong explained that the federal courts are deluged with writs of habeas corpus, and very few get accepted. "He's moving in the right direction," Furlong said. "He's got a leg up." Forchion has been stewing the Burlington County Jail for a month. He was arrested Aug. 18 after filming three commercials that the state claims advocated the use of marijuana. The commercials, as seen by The Trentonian, dealt with First Amendment issues and the war on drugs, and did not explicitly advocate the use of marijuana. But that's what members of the Intensive Supervisory Program said he did. ISP is a heightened state of parole Forchion was put into it after 17 months in prison for transporting 25 pounds of pot into the state. As part of Forchion's deal, ISP allegedly forbade him from advocating the use of marijuana, though Forchion claims no paperwork on such a restriction exists. Tom
Bartlett, the On Tuesday,
Forchion was supposed to appear before a three-judge panel in The hearing was meant to determine if Forchion did in fact break the terms of the ISP deal. Witnesses were in court, Forchion's lawyer was ready to go, and the judges said they would hold the hearing for last, supposedly so they could get a firmer handle on the case. The only
problem with the hearing was that it never took place -- the state
failed to arrange transportation for Forchion from "It was an
honest mix-up," No new date for the ISP hearing was announced. |
|||
|
DRUGWAR.COM11/20/2002 The Return of the Star
Chamber- by incarcerated
posted at DrugWar.com (for background on Forchion's case, please see No Freedom of Speech for Ed "NJWeedman" Forchion) Although most Americans don’t
know it, many of the rights we as Americans have were derived as a
result of the English trial in 1670 of William Penn. Eventually,
not only was Penn’s acquittal upheld but the jury was freed and Today in America the War on Some Drugs and Users has eroded most of these rights. We now even have illegal religions. I belong to one, Rastafari. The 4th Amendment is null and void, and the 6th and 7th Amendments are unrecognizable in the criminal justice system due to forced plea bargains. The 6th Amendment right to assistance of counsel for defense has been voided by State appointed lawyers who protect the State from citizens instead of how they were originally mandated: to protect citizens from abuse of government. The 6th and 7th Amendment rights to a speedy trial by a jury of one’s peers are now a rarity. In my original trial in 2000, I used Jury Nullification as a weapon and was successful to a point. I forced the State to offer me a light sentence, with the threat that my jury wouldn’t convict me. I was offered 3-6 months in prison, followed by 16 months in a program called Intensive Supervision Parole. A month into my 3-6 months, ISP informed me I was ineligible: The State had pulled a “bait and switch.” I was now stuck in prison with a 10 year sentence. From prison I
began fighting for a new trial, trying to withdraw my plea since the
State had renigged on its end of the
so-called bargain. The local press began reacting to my letters from
prison, writing stories based on my claims. Suddenly on Immediately upon getting into ISP, I discovered that instead of using ISP as the Intensive Supervision Program, the State intended to use it as the Inmate Silence Program. I was ordered not to talk about my religion, not to talk to the press, or petition for redress. I felt like a modern day William Penn. My ISP officer ordered me to dismantle the sanctuary I had built in my home. I viewed this as akin to William Penn having his church boarded up the English government. Similar to William Penn I defiantly refused to shut up, and was rearrested for complaining about my unconstitutional treatment. I was held for 5 days, from June 6-10, until I agreed by threat not to espouse my beliefs again publicly. Upon release though, I decided to go even more public, similar to how Penn held a public sermon after being told not to. Following the philosophy of the Great Rastafarian prophet and reggae singer Bob Marley, who said “stand up for you rights, don’t give up the fight, keep up the fight,” I made 3 anti-Drug War commercials that didn’t directly espouse my beliefs but did call for the end of the War on Some Drugs and Users which makes my religion as illegal as Quakerism was for William Penn. When the
Trentonian newspaper conducted an interview with me on August 15-17
about these commercials, I was arrested
again on The state is holding me to prevent me from espousing my beliefs or teaching the public about Jury Nullification. I have little doubt that today’s Star Chamber (ISP panel) will send me to prison. I have filed
a “Writ of
Habeas Corpus” with the Federal Court in |
|||
|
STAR-LEDGER 'WEEDMAN' FAILS IN EFFORT TO
GET OUT OF JAIL The self-proclaimed " The three-judge Intensive Supervision
Program panel that met yesterday The panel did not announce when the matter
would be resumed, but until Forchion had been admitted to the ISP in
April after serving 16 months of Forchion, accompanied by two lawyers,
public defender Craig Pierson and Thomas Russo, representing the program,
said Forchion was charged with 16 "I dispute the allegations that I violated
numerous conditions of my ISP," "I enrolled in the program, I wish to
remain in the program, but the Thomas Bartlett, a regional supervisor for
the ISP, said Forchion agreed In cross-examining Forchion says he never espoused the "use"
of marijuana after his release "Do you believe the First Amendment does
not apply to convicted felons?" "I believe you entered a voluntary program
and agreed to abide by the The New Jersey Chapter of the American
Civil Liberties Union has filed a Forchion, of Pemberton Township, Burlington
County, pleaded guilty in Forchion, who is a Rastafarian, has said he
used marijuana for religious Forchion was once escorted from the Copyright Newark Morning Ledger Co.
|
|
|
|
Subject:
Notice of Ed's hearings |
____________________________________________
The
This is a violation against Ed Forchion's and his 1st Amendment right to FREE SPEECH, this is about the "BILL of RIGHTS" not marijuana! Ed Forchion is Hoping that Protesters against the FAILED DRUG WAR, the Prison-Military-Industrial Complex which uses inmates as slaves, or anyone who cares about FREEDOM of SPEECH, and the right as an adult to choose which medicine or drug one ingests into their own bodies, to show up in force!
|
FEDERAL CASE BEGINS ( |
|||
|
|
|
|
Many judges favor revamp of drug laws
Linn Washington , Tribune Correspondent U.S. District
Court Judge Joseph E. Irenas revealed a startling fact in his During a hearing Tuesday on a drug law related case, Irenas stated he was surprised to discover the number of conservative federal judges opposed to current drug laws. "I attended a judicial conference out West a few years ago and most of the judges there were wearing cowboy hats, cowboy boots and string ties. Most of these judges were appointed by President Reagan and were very conservative," Irenas noted, "But to a person, everyone said drug laws need to be changed." While making
comments questioning the current drug laws, Irenas noted that when
President Bush appointed him to the federal bench in 1992 there were
32,000 people in federal prisons. " A number of federal judges, liberals and conservatives, have resigned from their lifetime appointments instead of imposing long mandatory sentences required by drug laws. Many judges feel mandatory-minimum drug laws are unfair because they generally strip jurists of their authority to craft sentences to match a defendant's actual criminal culpability. Laws mandate judges to sentence drug users and low-level dealers to long sentences while freeing major drug dealers who cut deals with prosecutors. Judges have criticized current drug laws as expensive, largely ineffective, and damaging to American civil liberties. "These unwise sentencing policies which put men and women into prisons for years, not only ruin lives of prisoners and often their family members, but also drains the American taxpayers of funds which can be measured in the billions of dollars," said Chief Judge of the federal 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Myron Bright. However, 8th Circuit Judge Diana Murphy, chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, claims that the judges critical of mandatory laws are mainly "senior judges who have never reconciled themselves to change." (Senior judges are retired judges who still hear cases.) Federal Judge
Joseph Irenas made his comments about drug laws during a hearing on a
matter involving Robert Edward Forchion, the self-styled “New Jersey
Weedman.” Forchion is suing Forchion contends that the written terms of his parole did not specifically prohibit his marijuana law reform advocacy. Judge Irenas stated that Forchion has complied with the terms of his parole requiring employment and he has repeatedly passed his twice-weekly urine tests showing he is not using marijuana. "The truth is
[Forchion] is not a menace to society. He is a right to participate in
First Amendment dialogue," Irenas said, noting that evidence indicates
the "New Irenas scheduled a
Jan. 21 "show cause" hearing where Forchion remains
incarcerated at the Renowned legal scholar Richard Posner, the chief Judge of the 7th Circuit Appeals Court, has voiced his support for the legalization of marijuana. "Prison terms in Linn |
|
Editorial NJ
AUTHORITIES DESTROY 'FREEDOMS' AS SURELY AS SADDAM The
curious case of Ed Forchion constitutes a classic clash between rights
and rules in Forchion faces a return to a 10-year prison sentence because New Jersey Intensive Supervision Program (ISP) authorities claim Forchion's exercise of his constitutional rights has violated a number of their rules for parole. These
'unwritten' rules include forbidding Forchion from talking to
reporters. Forchion - the self-defined 'NJ Weedman' - is an audacious
advocate for the legalization of marijuana and an ardent opponent of Forchion has certainly irritated governmental officials but, as a federal judge recently noted, Forchion is 'not a menace!" In
many ways, ISP's campaign to cancel Forchion's parole and return him to
a prison cell is an important test case for the level of freedom that
is really respected in The seminal First Amendment to the US Constitution protects freedoms of speech, religion, press, and the right to protest government actions. The NJ State Constitution contains comparable rights in its Article 1 - Rights and Privileges section. The First Amendment particularly protects the exercise of rights for unpopular causes as long as exercise of protected rights does not cause imminent danger or promotes illegal activity. Evidence indicates Forchion's exercise of constitutional rights does not promote illegal activity and his peaceful protests certainly are not causing imminent dangers like riots. NJ federal Judge Joseph Irenas recently indicated ISP's rule violation actions against Forchion strongly exhibit retaliation for Forchion's exercise of his lawful First Amendment rights. Two weeks ago, Judge Irenas ordered NJ authorities to produce evidence showing ISP is not retaliating against Forchion, during a hearing scheduled for Irenas' courtroom next week. Marijuana
is certainly an important public policy issue of our times extending
beyond the law enforcement arena into areas like medical compassion and
the very nature of democracy in Nationwide, authorities spend $9-billion annually waging war on marijuana at a time when authorities claim insufficient funds exist to provide adequate health care and/or extend meaningful tax cuts beyond the wealthy into the middle class. In 2001 alone, authorities nationwide arrested 723,627 for marijuana law violations with 88% of those arrests being for simple possession of this substance that numerous federal reports state is not harmful. Federal
authorities are staging military-style raids on health clinics in
states like In October 2002, a federal appeals court backed Congress blocking DC residents from even voting on whether to legalize marijuana for medical uses. These
actions by Congress and the courts crushing fundamental voting rights
in the very headquarters of American democracy probably brought smiles
to those "evil-doers" who our leaders proclaim hate Many - including law enforcement officials - support decriminalization of marijuana yet NJ's ISP authorities contend Ed Forchion has NO right to express similar sentiments. The
reason why Forchion is under ISP supervision results from his Sept 2000
guilty plea for a 1997 marijuana scheme. The reason why Forchion felt
forced to plead guilty results from repeated violations of his
fundamental legal rights from arrest through trial, according to a
federal appeal prepared by This appeal contends police violated legal rules in their arrest procedures, prosecutors violated legal rules by improperly withholding evidence, and judges violated rules by threatening to place Forchion in a mental institution to force Forchion to accept a public defender instead of permitting Forchion his legal right to represent himself. Further, prosecutors, public defenders, and a judge denied Forchion his right to inform the jury of the jury's right to acquit irrespective of the evidence if the jury felt a conviction was unjust - a legal principle called jury nullification. "This pattern of constitutional violations constitutes a farce and mockery of the judicial system," Saykanic's appeal states. Forchion entered ISP in April 2002 after nearly 18-months in prison following prosecutors reneging on an alleged agreement to release Forchion into ISP after 6-months in prison. The
thirty rules in Forchion's written ISP agreement contain no
prohibitions against talking to reporters, holding protests, or
advocating changes in drug laws. Yet, ISP authorities jailed
Forchion on August 18, 2002 for violating This Friday Forchion's case takes another turn with a scheduled ISP hearing where state judges will rule on the validity of those parole violations. Forchion did not receive his originally scheduled September 17, 2002 ISP hearing because of an 'inadvertent mistake' that left him in a cell while other ISP violators in the Burlington County jail were taken to that hearing. In the larger scheme of things, Forchion's constitutional freedoms fight with ISP arguably is one flea on a large elephant. However, the 12-million marijuana arrests since the late 1960s coupled with the escalating billions spent ineffectively fighting to preserve inappropriate prohibition shows this elephant suffers a serious flea infestation. The
Drug War's blatant disregard for constitutional rights forms a litany
of wrongs that renders -THE END-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attorney General PETER HARVEY’s "justice" department has been aiding, (and
abetting), the ISP authorities in this unconstitutional mockery of
JUSTICE. Federal Judge Irenas held a hearing for Edward on 12/31/02
which was very well reported by Professor of Journalism at Temple
University, Linn Washington, (story
included in the attachment). Judge Irenas has scheduled a follow-up
on |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
STAR-LEDGER 'Weedman' fights parole ruling State objects to man's efforts to make marijuana legal BY MATTHEW REILLY It will be at least a few more days before the self-styled "New Jersey Weedman" learns whether a federal judge will release him from prison and into the selective probation program he was ejected from by the state. Edward Forchion, of Pemberton in
U.S. District Court Judge Joseph
Irenas, sitting in Irenas said Forchion never tested positive for marijuana during the five months he was in the ISP program, even though he was regularly tested. The main reason for his being found in violation of his ISP terms was his continued open advocacy of reforming the state's marijuana laws. "Now we're down to the nub,"
Irenas told Deputy Attorney General James Harris during yesterday's
hearing in Forchion's fate is also in the hands of a separate entity -- a three-judge state panel that rules on the admission of inmates into the ISP program -- in a hearing that has been going on sporadically since December. The panel met last week without reaching a final decision on whether to reinstate Forchion into the program and is expected to take up the matter again next week. Forchion was returned to jail in August after violating terms of his admission into the program by advocating the legalization of marijuana by filming several public service announcements -- which never aired -- favoring changes in the state's drug laws, authorities said. Ed Barocas, legal director of the New Jersey Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said it is the advocacy positions taken by Forchion -- and not the other violations -- that formed the basis for the decision to revoke his participation in the program. Deputy Attorney General Harris said the ISP program is discretionary and that the administrators have the right to impose conditions on inmates who want to join it. Forchion has maintained he has not used marijuana since being incarcerated or while on parole, nor did he advocate its use. What he did advocate, he says, is a change in the laws governing marijuana use. Forchion is a practicing Rastafarian who used marijuana as part of his religious beliefs as well as for medicinal reasons. Forchion pleaded guilty in
September 2000 after he was charged with helping his brother and
another person pick up 40 pounds of marijuana that had been shipped via
Federal Express to |
|
|
|||||
|
TRENTONIAN JUDGE ISSUE'S INJUNCTION
|
|||||
|
|
|
"WEEDMAN" RELEASED BY FEDERAL JUDGE! |
|||||||||||||||||
|
TRENTONIAN FORCHION say's he'll keep waging battle! By LAURA PELNER, staff writer As expected "NJWEEDMAN" Ed Forchion was released from jail friday night after a federal judge intervened on
his behalf. Forchion, who had been in the BURLINGTON COUNTY JAIL for 5
months, was set free about "The first thing I'm going to do is renew my protest for my child custody situation," Forchion told the TRENTONIAN yesterday. "Now that the Judge has upheld ... the constitution, I'm going to renew my protest for my child visitation." In 1998, during the height of Forchion's campaign to legalize marijuana and stop the war on drugs, his ex- brought newspaper clippings to court in which Forchion was quoted. Before he had ever been convicted of a crime, a judge ruled he was unfit for his children and took away Forchion's visitation rights. Since then Forchion has had many run-ins with the law. His
most recent arrest, |
|||||||||||||||||
|
STAR-LEDGER Marijuana activist to re-enter early release program
BY MATTHEW REILLY A federal court judge yesterday ordered the "New Jersey Weedman" be freed from jail and returned to the early release program from which he was booted last year for advocating changes in the state's marijuana laws. U.S. District Court Judge Joseph
Irenas, sitting in
John Vincent Saykanic, a lawyer representing Forchion, said efforts were under way to get Forchion out of jail and home to his family. "Ed Forchion is a true freedom fighter," Saykanic said. "He has been fighting for what he believes in." Edward Barocas,
legal director of the "It makes clear to state officials that they cannot retaliate against a person under their control or supervision simply because they don't like the position he is advocating," Barocas said. Forchion had entered the Intensive Supervised Parole program last April after serving 16 months of a 10-year sentence for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. He was kicked out of the program last August for, among other things, advocating the legalization of marijuana. In his ruling, Irenas said it was clear that the conduct that led to Forchion's being kicked out of the ISP program and returned to jail is constitutionally protected. "Most of the infractions cited by the ISP officers involved (Forchion) either speaking to the press, protesting and handing out pamphlets outside of the courthouse, running a Web site, or producing and appearing in television commercials," Irenas wrote. "This behavior is clearly protected by the First Amendment, particularly since it primarily involved (Forchion's) belief that marijuana should be legalized." Irenas ordered that the ISP supervising officers be forbidden from removing Forchion from the program for any future violations unless they first give him 48 hours notice of their intentions. If there is possible immediate harm to the public good if Forchion is not removed from the ISP program, the ISP officers can make an emergency motion before Irenas. Irenas also ordered that Forchion cannot promote the illegal use of marijuana once he is released. Forchion was returned to jail in August after allegedly violating terms of his admission into the program by advocating the legalization of marijuana when he allegedly filmed several public service announcements -- which never aired -- favoring changes in the state's drug laws. Forchion of Pemberton Township, Matthew Reilly works in the |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Issue #280,
Ed Forchion, also known as the New
Jersey Weedman (http://www.njweedman.com), has since his marijuana
trafficking arrest in New Jersey in 1997 become an outspoken and
outrageous opponent of the state's and the nation's marijuana laws.
Energized by his arrest, Forchion commenced a flamboyant public
campaign to change the law and, hopefully, avoid being sent to prison
for 20 years. Forchion ran for the US Congress and for local office,
publicly smoking pot along the way. He appeared at the Finally, Forchion pled guilty in exchange for a
short prison stay, then got out on
probation last year. By then adopting the NJ Weedman moniker, Forchion
was in no mood to call it a day. He soon ran afoul of
Ed Forchion: Well, I'm semi-free, anyway; I'm in the ISP, the Intensive Supervision Program, although the state thinks it stands for Inmate Silence Program. The federal judge who freed me ordered ISP to take me back, and while I'm still in the program, they're leaving me alone. They used to make me meet with them twice a week to give urine samples, but now they don't let me near the other participants -- they're afraid I'll contaminate them by telling them the Constitution applies even to prisoners -- and they come to my house to urine test me. I'm still waiting to get the man off my back. I'm happy to be out, of course, but still shocked that I spent five months in jail for making a commercial.
Forchion: Yes, I was on ISP and had been ordered
not to talk to the press and not to talk about marijuana. I was in jail
when they told me those conditions, and I knew it was illegal, but I
was in jail and I wasn't about to say no. They wanted me to discontinue
my public stance for legalization, but when I got out, the newspapers
wanted to talk to me, and I talked to them. My parole officer gave me
written warnings, then when I continued
anyway, threw me in jail for five days in June. It was outrageous! How
can you throw someone in jail for talking to the press? That condition
of my parole was unconstitutional, and I told ISP that in a letter.
They replied that those were the rules, and that's when I decided to
challenge it as a First Amendment issue. That's when I taped those
commercials to advocate a policy change on marijuana. How can you
defend yourself if you don't have the right to free speech? I knew my
making the commercials would be controversial, but I didn't know they'd
throw me in jail for five months. Forchion: I filed a writ of habeas corpus to the federal court saying I was being punished for exercising my right to free speech, that the order that I not speak about pot was an unconstitutional condition of my confinement. (I was out on parole, but still serving my sentence, thus "confined.") In short, the federal judge agreed that I had the right to free speech. He ordered the state to show a reason why they had me in jail other than for exercising my First Amendment rights, and the state couldn't. I hadn't violated conditions of my parole, they had nothing, except that I talked about certain things to certain people. Of course, that took five months. I had also filed suit in the That's when the federal court, Judge Irenas, gave the state 21 days to show cause to keep me. They tried to argue that I didn't have free speech in ISP, but the judge ruled my imprisonment unconstitutional and ordered my release. I walked out of jail on January 24. WOL: Now you are suing Comcast for refusing to run your ads advocating a policy change on marijuana. What is it you hope to accomplish with this lawsuit, and surely the requested $420,000 in damages is just a coincidence? Forchion: Once the press started writing about my commercials, Comcast censored them. I had a signed agreement with them, I had put down a cash deposit, they had run my campaign commercials in 1999 and 2000, but they suddenly yanked the ads and made public statements saying I advocated drug use, saying I was advocating criminal activity. When my parole officer locked me up the next day, he used the same words Comcast used. This is a harassment lawsuit; it's designed to get Comcast to air those commercials. I spent five months in jail for those commercials, but they still haven't been on the air. And this is important because our movement can't afford network advertising rates, but cable channel ads are affordable. Comcast is the largest cable provider in the country, and they need to learn not to censor. I would drop the lawsuit in 420 seconds if they agreed to air the commercials. The $420,000 figure was a deliberate attempt to catch the attention of the marijuana community, but it's not about the money.
Forchion: I always thought marijuana should be legal, but like lots of people, I just sat around and smoked weed and talked about it. After I got arrested, then I went for it. I also wanted to do jury nullification. I wanted people on the jury to know who I was and how I felt, so I announced I was running for Congress against Rep. Rob Andrews and smoked a joint in his office. I did the same thing at Democratic Party headquarters here as I announced my candidacy for county freeholder. I swore I would smoke marijuana publicly at least once a month during my campaigns, which I did. I told the newspapers I would gladly plead guilty to conspiracy to grow pot if they would charge my coconspirator -- God. I smoked marijuana at the state capitol. I was arrested several times, but never prosecuted after I threatened to file a Religious Freedom Restoration Act defense. The bigger picture was that I was getting press
and getting my opinion heard. All those people in
Forchion: I guess I was a searcher. As a kid, I
rejected Christianity and religion. For awhile I wanted to be a Muslim;
I went to the temple and swore I would be the next Malcolm X. But by my
20s, I was an atheist. My army dogtags
said "atheist" and my Marine dogtags said
"no preference." I met some Jamaicans, I was smoking marijuana, and
they said I should let Jah into my life. I started finding myself then.
Rastafarianism teaches respect for nature and natural things, while
Christianity teaches that marijuana is the devil's weed, a sinful
thing. Rastafarianism eventually got me in trouble, because I believe
smoking marijuana is a religious freedom. If we had true religious
freedom, we would have an exception to the drug laws. But the
authorities in
Forchion: It is frustrating. People are afraid.
The drug laws are enforced tougher and harder against our communities.
The prisons are full of faces like mine. But there are only a couple of
black activists -- Cliff Thornton in
Forchion: I think the drug reform groups think I'm too wacky, with the NJ Weedman thing. Being the Weedman is a double-edged sword. It has got me attention from the mainstream media, and I've been accepted because the reporters listen and understand that what I'm saying is not wacky. But the other side is that movement people think I'm a lunatic. When I start talking about them providing me some help, they ask why they should give money to the silly NJ Weedman.
Forchion: I'm sure not going away. I spent five months in jail for trying to express myself; I want to see those commercials aired. I'm trying to present the case for legalization, but they won't let me put it on TV. So I will continue to push my court cases and I will continue to try to get media attention. It has worked for me and for the issue so far, and if you want to get some piece of legislation passed, you've got to get on the TV. I'm also the subject of two documentaries, one by Peter Christopher, which is strictly on the First Amendment fight, and the second by an independent filmmaker that will be broader, looking at the whole NJ Weedman thing. You know, at first people think "NJ Weedman, ha-ha," people think marijuana is a funny issue, but after they hear me out, it isn't so funny anymore. And now they can't ignore me. My picture has been in the paper many times, so people recognize me at Walmart, and I'm a celebrity at local courthouses. I'm not just another one of those million black guys fighting drug charges, I'm the NJ Weedman! I think the organizations interested in
legalizing marijuana need to reach a national consensus to push civil
disobedience and jury nullification. I think it's a waste of time to
try to lobby Democrats and Republicans to change the law -- there may
be at best a handful of sympathetic congressmen -- so it's up to we the people to change these laws. If the drug
reform and marijuana legalization groups got behind jury nullification,
we can change those laws. There is tremendous potential there -- just
look at the Ed Rosenthal case. If a single juror there knew he could
have voted his conscience, Ed would have walked free. This is a
valuable option. People wouldn't convict their neighbors for beer
violations during alcohol Prohibition; we can do the same thing now.
Lots of people don't think people should be punished for marijuana, and
jury nullification gives us the chance to exploit that. We have the
power, if we just choose to exercise it, but we need to teach the
people. If we can use public sentiment in this way, we can win. Juries
can judge the law as well as the facts -- let's put the law on trial.
|
|
|